



|
CYBERNATIAN |
|
On The Contrary |
|
The failure of the Big tree that threatened the lively hood of many or all whose nest was built on.
As we lay men, particularly from a certain part of the world and certain section of the world population are prone to telling a story to convey an opinion, a wisdom of our ancestors and a piece of advice we deem necessary that people know; So here again, I tell a story that is not backed up by any of the methods of known standards of learned men and women of the time, but simply and innocently as any innocent lay man observes them. As we lay men had no backing of the enlightenment that most are endowed, we make no claim of empiricism of science and broad analytical indices to say what feel is right and wrong. We just say them, and our backs are often flexible to the onslaught when it comes and to carry the burden when loaded. Our empiricism is grounded in our collective personal experiences and our indices our traditions that have been passed from our ancestors down the line for generations. In that tradition and without much due emphasis and attention to the norms and standards of modern day academics and the sophistication of terminology and methodology here is an idiomatic story as we lay people see it and feel it. I grew up in Africa, Then Africa was not stripped of its trees and there were ample around. Then there were trees that birds could nest on as sparsely as they wished, In time as all Africa’s natural resources, trees were being chopped down leaving fewer every passing day forcing the birds to congregate their nesting more and more to the remaining fewer trees. These processes continued unabated by either nature or human ingenuity till there was only a tree or two remained in a considerable land mass. As knowledge of the vitality of the trees to the well being of the birds and humanity set in, every one scrambled to protect the remaining big trees despite the understanding of the trees morbidity due to lack of support and dependencies on its kinds and equals. The effort to avert the morbidity inherent in nature would have been in vain. Now, the huge seemingly all accommodating tree is not up to the task and due to the increased and concentrated predators visible and invisible, over surface and under surface simply gives in threatening the entire colony. It would be a matter of layman’s logic and rational to say that it would have not been enough nor would it have been appropriate to make the effort to save the last of the morbid trees than to let them die, but to let them grow to the point where every bird has to build its nest on it in the first place. A hundred bushes would have accommodated the number of bird nests and the human needs included better and the failure of one or two would have by much less threatening and have effectual consequences. At last this layman asks a rhetorical question and rests. Knowing that letting the big tree grow to the point where its failure threatens the well being of the entire colony was wrong in the first place, Wouldn’t prudence dictate that as the colony makes an effort to prolong its life, yet make a double triple effort in planting many replacement trees and let them not grow too big again to the point where they have to be propped up by the entire colony to avert their failure so as to make the failure of one or some yet a natural replaceable act?
Ayele Teklemariam To Daniel Donnet's View of ReligionI feel it might shade some light as to how much and how far religious zealots has gone and is going in literally controlling and disciplining if one is seen to deviate from the official line. The belief in miracle and the making a miracle as the central ethos to their mysticism they have become willing and not at all hesitant to deploy any and all known gadgets and know how to perversely influence, coerce, dominate and subjugate any and all real and perceived deviants. One can cry out loud and there is no help or even sympathy despite the constitutional guarantees for individual rights to worship or not worship, belong or not belong, this letter I believe serves as compliment to the article By Daniel Dennet on religion. Though I disagree with his ideas of what religion and spirituality ought to be and how it ought to be practiced, I strongly agree with his description of the perverse practices by some and even by the overwhelming majority of the authorities of organized religion. Organized religion is about interest and material class and group fulfillment not about the inner search for the truth and individual and social self fulfillment despite the audacious self portrayal. As to making the most vital decisions of our lives in consultation with our inner voices I cannot understand the objections to that as we all make our vital life and death decisions in consultation with our inner voices and I see no exception to that. But if our inner voices somehow become inner voices of our religions authorities inner voices' as is often the case, the concern is justified. Organization presupposes classification professionalism, specialization and division of labor on the basis these stratifications. Is it any wonder then that like all socially stratified structures those in the high end of the structure to have a stake in mystifying the practice and making it shrouded in secrets in defense of their acquired or given status. If any irrationality is condoned or encouraged in any social structure there is no need to explain that it could only be by those who are able and are in position to do so and it is clear who those could be that it needs no explanation. The one big note to be made here is though that all hierarchical social structures are susceptible of encouraging acts of irrationality and irrational exuberance with varying degrees (the curse of division of labor and social stratification). As these religious institutions and social structures gave rise to science and scientific institution and the continuous ineptitude of the latter to find answers for the fundamental perplexing issues of ours' and everything Else's beginning, current existence and future destiny; had engendered and continues to engender the ever continued appeal of the practice of religion and spirituality. The truth of spirituality has been for Melina and I am sure will continue for another to be an effort to find in ones inner self the truth and self that is lucking in the material and scientific world out there, here and everywhere. That search in the gaps by itself between the material realities of yesterday, today and tomorrow that that we can reach only by our intuition's and that which we can only imagine and could not quantify and qualify by all other ways and means yet available will always draw us to spirituality individually and collectively. Ayele Teklematiam check me out,Br>
Where do you stand? August 28, 2009 Often your understanding of what you look at is very dependant to where you stand. You stand in front of a human being you will see all the frontal physical attributes of a human being and may be more, like wise if you stand behind a person you can only see the rear side and may be half of his all realty. In any of cases you can only know half of the truth about the person you looked at, you could have looked at him from a side and still your knowledge of him would have been no different. As tradition in decency dictates to have a full knowledge one may have to look at a realty or form both the two complimentary and opposite sides. As it is said that there are two sides to a story the story you tell could not only depend from what side you looked at, but from what sides you looked at . When we tell a story we often forget that we are as well the judges of that story's completeness, truthfulness, or objectivity and engage in a half baked half truths and stand convicted in the court of our own conscience. A guilty conscience often once entered will feed on itself and create a cascaded chain of degradation of conscientiousness that it is often advice able no to wound once conscience than try to heal it. I say all these to make a point and clarify a reality as I see it from a vantage point and an angle I stand and felt that I out to tell it and I will. When issues of conscience are raised it is often persecution, defamation, being ostracized, and exclusion and in the worst cases scenarios confinement and prison are the consequences. Even if I am spared of all these, I am certain that the story I am about to tell or write is not going to win me a popularity contest anywhere, yet I am certain that it will exonerate me in the court of my conscience as I am certain will do likewise to the main actor of the story. � As an Ethiopian saying goes "when afraid of the donkey beat on the load" so as not to be accused of not beating it and spare yourself of the possible donkey's kickback. Playing it safe as they say it here in America. By admission and indictment while it have made clear and even the coast are assessed and charged to the donkey for its complicit act in preparing loading and getting it delivered to the recipient I wonder what good would it be doing to beat on the load for being what it is. It is often customary and the standard code of ethics and conduct anywhere and everywhere a state machine is in operation and is functional operatives to be obedient and accepting of their superior's orders and directives or else insubordination is treason punishable up to and including capital punishment depending on places and circumstances. We have often times stood in witness that official high in the ranks stand up and say the bucks stop here and take full or partial responsibility for the commands and orders they issued while in command. The Irony here is that the commander in chief having admitted to the guilt of the crime and paid retributions thereof and gives the operative as a guilty individual to stand trial and be convicted, here the travesty of justice and the double jeopardy comes to light very vivid to anyone willing to see. Knowing that �the state had admitted to the guilt of the alleged crime It would not be such a hard thing to imagine how the operative could have been stuck in between a rock and a hard place to refuse or accept the assignment �handed down from his superiors and as modern day training and discipline dictates he knows well what insubordination means and he wouldn't dare, particularly in states where rulers are for life and sometimes are believed to be by divine providence. Isn't it a surprise and something that stirs in one a sense of bizarre feeling? While the guilt is admitted by the state and the retributions are paid in money, giving the sacrificial lamb that was ordered to mission and later convicted for the crime of following an order, shouldn't be an excuse for the authorities who commanded the action and admitted to the responsibility to be normal collegial members of the club of their likes an incomprehensible indiscretion; If that is the sight of justice I feel it couldn't have been any blinder than that and if it is the hearing of justice it couldn't have gotten any deafer either. While we have excused the state that was allegedly committed the crime and paid the blood money because it could afford, it is incomprehensible to hear the out roar of ambivalence to the forgiveness given the poor soul who was an instrument of the atrocious act by direct orders of his superiors in the chain of command or else the state had nothing to apologize for and pay retributions. It sure seems like an inversion of logic and known reason, and that is how it appeared to many who were in a better proximity of the acts and the actors. There is no wonder that proximity also gives a better understanding of a circumstance and those who are closer had viewed it differently and from a different angle to others who condemned it than ask what?, how ?and why? They saw what they did and it doesn't help anyone. At the end what you see is very much dependent on where stood and how you saw it and on where and when they did. Those my dear are the rules of relativity.
Here we do again!! It has come to a mile stone in what have thus far been and what is now. There sure is yet again another effort to wipe out from memory what one have worked for the last part of one's life, and day and night audio broadcast is in earnest to effect exactly that. There is no doubt that whatever the ultimate goal of that engagement was had climaxed and all evidence and trace had to be somehow erased by all means and by whatever it takes. Sense of guilt and consciences suspended and replaced by sense of interest and selfish advantages that sympathy and empathy are deliberately omitted from normal discourse. Despite all declarations and proclamations of benevolence and good will towards fellow human beings and life in general or nature in its totality, it is heart breaking and mind searing to have to bear and live such arrogant ,self serving acts of exploitative and deceitful intrusion in to any ones live and no one seems to mind at all. It is a thousand times better an act to physically do away with a person than assonate his person hood his psyche and let him live in a vegetative state. It is the cruel effort of unprecedented proportion when ones brain is often attacked by radio transmissions of epoch proportions just to wipe out what one has worked on all his life time .If nothing else to retain a sense of melancholy is a defining character of personhood that its deprivation is a cruelty beyond and above the cruelty of physical extermination. After all life devoid of memory and sense of perception is dead life or is a none living being. Life's fundamental definer is its endowment of its existence's process and characters containment in its DNA, with a memory and a cognitive capability of a sort in its own right. That to me is the fundamental common among all and every living thing we humans included and if we had that, may be we are considered alive and be appreciative of life The Winner takes it all Darwinian World of free Free Marketers.
Unreasonable exuberance. There seems no end to these idiotic onslaught of botchery by them modern Christ's touch and heal doctors of death of the modern media sponsored and promoted magicians of a sort who are making mockery of the medical profession itself. God only knows where and when it is going to end ,it seems headed to last for a long time to come as long as it is fed and nourished by the sensation starving substance deficient media and public. Everything goes for money and all is possible for money power and fame have long been the slogan that even murder has a way of getting around it as long as it is done for them and by them who had mustered the slightest advantages over others. Truthfulness, conscientiousness, morality, ethics, empathy and sympathy are words that fill the air waves ,but practiced the least beyond the mere lip service that it is accorded both by the media and the public at large. There seems an over all decadence and obsolescence that does not tolerate the freedom to think , speak and act and deals with it in purity and had a mind set of keeping freedom by stomping on freedom itself despite the established fact that freedom 's only exchange value have always been and still remains life itself. Human sacrifice has long been abolished except for only one precious asset that is freedom. When humanity is shortchanged in its freedom to think, speak and act one would have nothing to have left to need living. Institutionalized organized and premeditated violation of my basic and fundamental rights are being in constant and continues violation that one finds it unpalatable to continue under the circumstances in the modern time and contemporary world. It has become clear from past experiences that no amount of appeal no amount of tolerance and no amount of patience is enough to stop and abate nor slow down these scourge set in motion, but may be only an alternative ways to the ones that had been tried thus far. Appeals mad to those who are able and in power had been either ignored or were not given due considerations, and there is no reason to believe that they would if one had to make them now and again. May be the big rivers are fed by the loyal tributaries if one is not loyal enough a tributary to influence, the quot;it quot; might simply doesn't exist at least in the mind of the beneficiary and why care for the dead vein while the loyal and dedicated artery still brings in enough blood for sustenance.
Why and who? Who are these sites and businesses that are linking and publishing my articles and materials? 2) Why are they not asking for permission while it is clearly stated on the very top of every page that the contents are copyrighted? 3)Why do I find my domain name associated with some sites that would by no means could get a consent from me to be in any way associated? 4) Having had so many articles and materials published and in circulating on the web and on line why is it that I am not getting any positive or negative feedbacks? 5) If all or part of my publications were not interesting enough to garner a response why are they being republished by so many sites and blogs? 6)Whose interest am I serving without my consent and even knowing for free and I don't even get noticed or my existence acknowledged? 7) Does institutional cyber slavery exist? 8) Is there a possibility of restitution to my losses moral, social, psychological, physical and material? 9) Are intimidations, attempts to blackmail, harassment, coercing and stalking feedbacks to my publications? 10) when an "Emperor" dies of a misadventure of his own making or simply due to nature taking its formal course, does a" commoner" have to wear his mask and follow the fairytale of love boat dream of being the "Emperor" and die his death or wake the hard reality of material fact for the honor of satisfying "the living Spirit" of the dead "Emperor"? Or by the same token when "Queens" or "Kings" are enthroned do they have to deface the path that led them to their "coronation" and do away with the "horse" they rode to the "throne" with and without his /her (its) intent and consent? And above everything else how many times and how long? These are by in large the questions that cry out loud as I examine the path that they traversed and their current standing and the future fates of my domains cybernatian.biz,org,net,us and was and the contents I mustered to put on them and more. This is an effort to lay down the history of the formation, the process and all the efforts that were put to make it affect the intents of their formation and serve the interests of their maker. What went wrong and how they were usurped many times over by high hackers and reckless individuals and groups with no regard to other's property and belongings of proprietorship are due to mainly:-My reliance on others conscience to do the right thing that led me to lay my guards down, Never thinking that they will garner such an intense interest and draw such powerful interested groups that are willing to kill for, failed to peg them to other equally powerful interests. Looking back I could imagine the difference it would have made, but that have come to pass without me taking the chance and refuse to dowel on it now rather than looking forward to the future while taking in to account the lessons of the past. I have come to realize be it in the underground or the over ground world of business, the fitistic Darwinian survival is often at work and it is a world of the killer survives and the moralist and legalist utopia is a mere smokescreen or even worse it is just a means to fulfill the will and interest of the few witty who by accident or sheer will power found their niche at swaying public opinion and perception hard reality aside. Economic game theory as it seems never to have a direct bearing on the everyday business world and as games are a synonymous with gambling, despite the laws on the books outlawing gambling; the reality on the ground tells a reality of gaming and gambling as the horizontal and vertical fabrics of modern and prehistoric societies. In the effort to untangle the riddle it rather seems important enough to realize the simplicities of the complexities of modern day business, the seemingly intricate and non navigable business relationships that comes live as one unravels the games played and the gambling that took place , the deals made and brokered, the winners, losers and the swindlers and the windfalls and the dust spills that is wrapped up in the artistic lingo jingo of the modern day business world's aristocracy. by |
|
The contents of this website are protected by the copy rights law as registered and catalogued in the US Copyrights office on March 15, 2006. Registration number = TXu-327-600. |